Showing posts with label Planned Parenthood. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Planned Parenthood. Show all posts

Wednesday, May 4, 2011

The Great Fungibility Fallacy

Fungibility: "the property of a good or a commodity whose individual units are capable of mutual substitution. Examples of highly fungible commodities are crude oil, wheat, orange juice, precious metals, and currencies."

Fallacy: "usually incorrect reasoning in argumentation resulting in a misconception."


If you haven't been keeping up with the HR3 news, here's a recap: There's no such thing as federal funding for abortions. Unless, of course, you believe that PAP smears, contraception, cancer screenings and treatment, WIC appointments, STI tests/treatments, and, in some cases, in vitro fertilization, all somehow consist of procuring abortions.

Why is this relevant? Because today our House votes on the "No Taxpayer Funding For Oompaloopas Act". Oops. I mean "Abortion" - "No Taxpayer Funding For Abortion Act". Our trusted government officials are wasting taxpayer dollars voting to defund and restrict from using taxpayer dollars something that is already, and has been since 1976, restricted from using taxpayer dollars. So yeah. They're defunding a unicorn. It all comes down to Title X and the funding of Planned Parenthood. Planned Parenthood provides abortions. Not every clinic provides that specific service. But they all provide very vital services for all people regarding reproductive health. And they all keep their doors open through funding of Title X.

Since 1976 and the passing of the Hyde Amendment, federally funded health services (such as Planned Parenthood) who provide abortion services were prohibited from using any of the funding to assist with the cost of an abortion, except in the cases of rape, incest, or threat to the mother's health. Even with such exceptions, getting approval for that coverage is near impossible; thus only 191 women were covered in 2008. But even though the conservatives got their way and cut off health care assistance to the poor women who probably need it most (and that's all the Hyde Amendment did, I assure you), the conservatives still aren't satisfied. They want to strip all federal funding from these clinics so they can protect their tax dollars from being used for abortions. Oh, wait. They're not? Oh. Well then I just don't want my tax dollars being used for a clinic that provides that service despite the fact that not one cent of my money will touch "the unspeakable procedure". I'm going to play this card in the name of Fungibility.

The idea goes as such: that if our money goes to Planned Parenthood, it doesn't matter that our money is kept separate from abortion provision. It only matters that our money went to Planned Parenthood, despite the fact that it would be used for such services as preventing the further need for abortion. Their thinking is that if it goes to the same clinic, then, in a round-about way, it still pays for abortion no matter how separate the funding is.

At face value, this may seem like a logical line of thinking. But when talking about federal funding so accidentally and loosely being applied to something someone doesn't like, we have to be all-inclusive. While the rest of the world knows that federal tax dollars don't fund abortion procedures, when looked at through the fungibility fallacy it turns out that all federal tax dollars apparently pay for all abortion procedures.

1. The woman who rides the bus to the clinic is using federal funding in two ways: the bus itself and the road that was paved using taxpayer dollars.

2. If she is low income and thus on welfare, the money she didn't have to spend on food was used to pay for her procedure.

3. Law Enforcement protects the clinics, clinic workers, and the patients from harm. This includes the FBI who have to clean up after such anti-choice messes as the murder of Dr. George Tiller and the Pensacola bombings of 1984.

4. Every government employee's salary is paid by taxpayers. In the event that any one of those employees, for any reason, sought an abortion, you paid for it.

5. Federal grants for college have a few ways they contribute to abortion access. The first being: MED SCHOOL. I think that one speaks for itself. The second: financial aid refund checks. Yeah, the one that students have to stretch out across the semester to ensure they can survive. In more than a few cases I can assure you her survival consisted of scraping together what the private abortion funds couldn't cover.

And those are only a few ways that your tax dollars are "fungible" when it comes to abortion. And it has nothing to do with what money Planned Parenthood gets. You see, even if you do succeed in destroying the only access to adequate reproductive health care that poor people have, you will still, under the great law of Fungibility, still be paying for these abortions. Your only solution, in this case, will be to stop paving roads, sending people to college, having a police department, or paying government employees. In other words, you'd have to stop paying taxes completely.

But the rational choice would be to drop all this HR3 crap and keep all funding for Planned Parenthood to ensure the further prevention of that which you don't want. Defunding them to prevent abortion is as counterproductive as trying to stop war by attacking other countries or setting something on fire to cool it off. That said, it's time to do the responsible thing and contact your state representatives. Stop letting a complete fallacy strip impoverished people of their right to reproductive health care.

Thursday, February 24, 2011

Common Sense: Capt. Obvious Edition

We all know that common sense isn't exactly a great friend of the antichoice community. Most antis I've encountered treat common sense as a mortal enemy. This, I fear, may have swept part way into the prochoice community as well. Not that we lack common sense at all, but more that we allow ourselves to be so sucked into their desperate graspings that we have begun to overlook the simplest, most obvious facts that crush their reasonless screechings. I fear we've begun letting them derail us. Here's a few things I've noticed.

Example 1: Lila "Ruse" and her Planned Parenthood "Stings".

I'm sure we're all aware by now of Lila's "work" (I'm sure it would make great fiction!). But to recap, she had actors enter several Planned Parenthood facilities posing as sex traffickers requesting the assistance of Planned Parenthood in treating underage, illegal girls. Listening to the hype being passed around the antichoice groups these videos are "proof" of Planned Parenthood aiding and abetting child prostitution rings.

Really? It's proof? If these videos were such concrete evidence of these hideous, felonious accusations, why did they need a vote to defund Planned Parenthood? Anyone else accused of such a thing would have been promptly arrested. A full scale FBI investigation would have been launched. The doors of every Planned Parenthood facility would have been closed immediately. But that's not at all what happened. In fact, it is Live Action Films being investigated for their little game, is it not?

Example 2: The Kill Doctors Act

The excuse being used for this one is self defense. The idea is that if a fetus is in some kind of imminent danger, another party can intervene using deadly force if necessary. Those supporting this bill insist this is for the woman's protection, to protect her from assaults that could potentially harm her fetus. They also claim that the prochoice community is just making up batty propaganda to aide abusers.

But, wait, what was that? To protect her? But doesn't that already exist? Oh yes. I believe they call it Self Defense. After all, if the woman isn't consenting to an abortion, how would a person damage a fetus without first causing harm to the woman? They couldn't. The only way a potential abuser has to get to a fetus is through that woman's body. If she, or someone else, shot that person in the face, I have no doubt it would labeled as Justifiable Homicide. Because that person would have had to beat her pregnancy to its end. It would have been an assault.

Example 3: The Supposedly High Revenue Planned Parenthood Has From Abortion

I've been seeing arguments that 1/3 of Planned Parenthoods income is from abortion. I've yet to see anything substantiating this claim, just the statements antis have regurgitated from one another.

Disclaimer: I have no data to back this one up, but bear with me. This is working solely from a Common Sense Theory and very little knowledge of economics.

We know that federal funding is restricted from paying for abortions. All federal funding that Planned Parenthood receives goes to non-abortion related services: contraception, cancer screenings, prenatal care, parenting classes, adoption, WIC access, etc. We all know the list. It's a huge one. We also know that only 3% of Planned Parenthoods services are abortion care. So if it's only 3% of their services, doesn't it seem disproportionate that 1/3 of their income is from that tiny number of abortions? No. Not really. First, I sincerely doubt that abortion accounts for that much of their annual revenue. But, even if it did, it would make still make sense. They don't receive federal funding for it! It's the one service women have to pay out of pocket for without assistance unless they are fortunate enough to get assistance from a private abortion fund. It would be the same story if they restricted federal funding for any other service Planned Parenthood offered. If women had to pay out of pocket for PAP smears, then PAPs would account for a high portion of Planned Parenthoods income. That income is so high because that's what the antis want it to be. It simply signifies that they cut federal funding for abortions. They shouldn't act so surprised when they pushed to cut assistance to women in need and it happened.

Yes, I know that this post is very sloppy. I am tired. Let me know if I need to adjust something. Or, hell, if I'm just plain mistaken!